The contradiction of the female figure in Belarusian politics
In the months leading up to the 2020 elections, Alyaksandr Lukashenka’s remark that the “constitution is not written for women” sparked significant public outcry. Operating within a deeply patriarchal paradigm, he rarely shies away from such sexist comments. Yet, he continuously underestimates the role of women and their potential in politics, as seen in recent Belarusian history.
Since 1994 Alyaksandr Lukashenka has held an unyielding grip on Belarus, often referring to himself as a “women’s president”. This characterization is not without purpose; he strategically appeals to specific demographics within the electorate, many of whom find themselves in vulnerable positions reliant on state social support – predominantly women. One might wonder why he still seeks voter loyalty when elections are routinely manipulated and international observers repeatedly report ballot stuffing and significant violations in vote counting. The reality is that genuine support from even a fraction of the electorate simplifies his task. It allows for less money and administrative resources to be spent on falsification and for mitigating the impacts of dishonest elections. The mass protests of 2020 arose precisely because the scale and transparency of the fraud were too blatant to ignore.
February 28, 2025 -
Nasta Zakharevich
- 
Issue 1-2 2025MagazineStories and ideas
VILTVART / Shutterstock
This article is for members only
Join the New Eastern Europe community to unlock this article — plus enjoy full access to premium content, our digital archive, newsletter insights, and podcast updates.
Already a member? Sign in to read the full article.
