Articles and Commentary

Hybrid deportation from Crimea

Crimean TatarsIn February 2014 troops lacking military insignia invaded Crimea and swiftly took over key military and strategic sites. A referendum was hastily organised, even though it violated Ukrainian law and international norms. The Russian press claimed that 97 per cent of those who voted were in favour of annexation and 83 per cent of the electorate had turned out. While these figures were cited by international news media sources, a report by the President of Russia’s Council on Civil Society and Human Rights (that was posted at the president-sovet.ru web site) showed that only between 15-30 per cent of Crimean citizens voted for unification with Russia. With the bogus referendum swept under the rug, a treaty was signed between the newly proclaimed Republic of Crimea and the Russian Federation to initiate a process of integration.

Read more: Hybrid deportation from Crimea

Trump declares support for Georgia despite Russian encroachment

Trump KvirikashviliUS President Donald Trump’s connection to Georgia can be traced to 2011 after a meeting of then business tycoon Trump and Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili in Trump Tower in New York. Later in 2012 Trump visited Batumi, a Georgian Black Sea resort, turning it into the main touristic hub in the region with an attempt to license the use of the Trump name for the construction of a Trump building in Batumi. Acknowledging many business and investment opportunities, Trump called Georgia “one of the really amazing places in the world right now”.

 

Years later, the project was officially cancelled. Georgia underwent a political reshuffle – the Georgian Dream party replaced Saakashvili’s United National Movement – and due to domestic charges, Saakashvili moved to Ukraine in an attempt to relaunch his political career, first as Odesa Governor and later starting his own party in Ukraine – the Movement of New Forces.

 

Nevertheless, as president, Trump welcomed Georgia’s prime minister, Giorgi Kvirikashvili, to the White House in early May, who later received a closed-door meeting with Vice President Mike Pence. According to the vice president’s office, the leaders affirmed the strength of US-Georgian strategic partnership and recognised Georgia’s substantial contributions to global security. Moreover, Pence stressed the US’s firm support for the territorial integrity of Georgia reaffirming Washington’s backing of Tbilisi’s Euro-Atlantic aspirations, including its strive for NATO membership. 

 

In other words, Georgia managed to raise its most heated foreign policy issue – NATO membership. The issue remains on top of the agenda with Russia bolstering military troops in the two breakaway regions of Georgia – Abkhazia and South Ossetia, which were taken over after the five-day war in 2008. In the aftermath of the war, Russia recognised the Georgian sovereign territories as “independent states” and ever since has pursued a policy of creeping annexation, undermining Georgia’s security. Such moves are highly unsettling for Georgia particularly while it is widely believed that there are friendly ties between Russian and US presidents.

 

In fact, after pledging firm support for Georgia – awkward timing considering it came right after the controversial firing of James Comey, the former director of the FBI investigating the Trump campaign's contacts with Russian officials – Trump met with Russia’s foreign minister, Sergey Lavrov, at the White House. 

 

Shortly after the meeting with Georgia’s prime minister, Trump signed an immense federal spending bill containing a provision openly dubbing the Kremlin-backed breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia as “Russian-occupied Georgian territories”. Furthermore, the bill explicitly prohibits assistance to countries that recognised the independence of the Georgian territories. In essence, Russia, Nicaragua, Venezuela and Nauru would no longer be eligible for any US government financial support.

 

Paradoxically, while the Georgian delegation secured Trump’s support for Georgia in the dispute with Russia over the annexed territories, the Georgian government let persona non-grata former Moscow Mayor Yuri Luzhkov to illegally enter Tbilisi, Georgia. Back in 2009, Luzhkov urged Georgia to recognise the “independence” of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, fostering discord among Georgian people. Surprisingly, during his recent visit, the ex-mayor made an almost identical comment about Georgia’s breakaway regions: “I think that Abkhazia is an absolutely different country, people are different there. And it is the same with South Ossetia. Of course, there is some feeling of nostalgia and anger, but I still think that after the breakaway of those regions, Georgia is going to feel much better in future.”

 

Aside making political statements, Luzhkov visited Georgia’s occupied territories – Abkhazia and South Ossetia – for official meetings in 2006 and 2009, violating Georgian Law on Occupied Territories. Despite the fact that the violation of the law by officially regarded persona non-grata was self-evident, the Georgian government let him enter the country. It is quite notable that such an entry was permitted while the official delegation stressed its aspirations towards NATO and EU membership, asking Trump for the support of the territorial integrity of Georgia.  

 

Astonishingly, nine years since the August 2008 War, Georgia’s deputy minister of interior, Shalva Khutsishvili, called Luzhkov a known staunch supporter of the independence of Georgia’s breakaway territories, yet added that: “There was no particular reason for preventing Luzhkov from entering Georgia when crossing the state border. He entered by the legal document that envisaged no sign of him having violated the law on occupied territories. Therefore, the border guard had no formal basis to make any different decision”.

 

Rather awkwardly, the Georgian foreign minister, Mikheil Janelidze, called Luzhkov’s statements provocative. However the Georgian MFA avoided any confirmation that Luzhkov’s visit was legal, in compliance with the Law on Occupied Territories. Prior to these events, the Georgian government officially denied entry to the controversial pro-Putin biker group called “Night Wolves”. Yet, the bikers later appeared in the center of Tbilisi commemorating the 72nd anniversary of the end of the Second World War.

 

As a cherry on top of the Georgian government’s blurry political axis, Russian forces renewed its creeping annexation schedule on July 4th, moving the administrative boundary fence closer and closer to the central Georgian highway which connects the eastern part of Georgia to the west part of the country.

 

Finally, such events raise uncertainty within the Georgian population as the publicly declared aspirations towards NATO and EU membership are under solid question marks. Incoherent, or at times contradicting, political decisions have sparked protests and pushed the newly independent country into political turbulence, while Russian hostility continues to grow in the South Caucasus and every misleading policy approach could generate long-lasting damaging results.

 

Beka Kiria is a political analyst, and a member of the Younger Generation Leaders Network on Euro-Atlantic Security. He is also a former defence and security official at the Georgian Ministry of Defence, and a member of NATO’s Future Alumni Network. He tweets at @BekaKiria

Law and Justice in Poland (part II)

Judge-Court-Hammer-Law-Paragraph-Justice-Clause-1707735This is part II of In Between Europe’s talk with Christian Davies of the Guardian, explaining the recent changes to the judiciary in Poland.

Read more: Law and Justice in Poland (part II)

Ukraine’s reforms: Taking off or yet to take off?

UA CH confFollowing the Revolution of Dignity, Ukraine has put its hopes in a new generation of reformers and seeks to, or rather has to, break free from its corrupt power circles. This was the conclusion reached at a major Chatham House event on Ukraine’s transformation last week, just one day before the UK-Ukraine conference that launched Ukraine`s Reform Action plan 2017-2020. Although the conference began with a negative tone in reference to the ongoing war in the eastern parts of the country, it brightened, looking at the promising future for investors and young professionals in Ukraine.

 

Does Ukraine matter to Europe? This was the question that seemed to be at the core of the discussions. However, the overall answer to the question was rather mixed. What can and must Ukraine do to become a competitive and advanced European country, rather than a state which needs continuous help while failing to deliver on its own promises?

Read more: Ukraine’s reforms: Taking off or yet to take off?

Subcategories

  • The Road to Vilnius
    Article Count:
    2
  • EuroMaidan

    New Eastern Europe's Continuing coverage of the Euromaidan Protests in Ukraine

    The Ukrainian government’s decision to put the country’s European integration on hold was met by a spontaneous protest of middle class and students. Three days later the rally organised by political parties attracted the biggest turnout since 2004 Orange revolution events.

     

    Article Count:
    3
  • Intermarium
    Article Count:
    11

Partners